Feedly Likes

Chinese tech giants are snapping up gaming studios around the world

People play computer games at an internet cafe in Fuyang, China's Anhui province.
Lu Qijian | Visual China Group | Getty Images
LONDON – After decades of the U.S. and Japan dominating the gaming space, China's influence is growing as its tech giants snap up gaming studios around the world.
Now, some experts think video games could look a little different in the coming years as a result.

Questions are being asked about whether the Chinese owners of U.S. and European studios will try to influence the games they make, or indeed use them to promote Chinese values. It remains to be seen but subtle changes could happen in the coming years, according to some experts.
"Some of these values might be different from what many expect," British-Chinese writer Lu-Hai Liang told CNBC. "For example, Chinese female gamers are a massive market (500 million) and there have been many female-focused games and game studios that revel in this sector."
Thomas David, a semiconductor engineer in the U.S., told CNBC that he thinks gamers could start to see more titles where the "good guy" is Chinese and the "bad guy" is from the West, for example.
China's own gaming market is heavily regulated. It does not allow games that contain certain political views, gambling, gore, nudity and many other things to be released and sold in its home market. The movie industry is equally strict, with U.S. films having to be adapted before they can be released in China.
Exporting Chinese culture"This area — how China could use games to export its culture — is incredibly important and largely missed," Abishur Prakash, co-founder of the Center for Innovating the Future, told CNBC.

"China has several ways it can take its ideals to the world through games, and build a new kind of global power," said Prakash. "One way is by banning certain topics, like Taiwan or human rights, from being discussed," he said.
China could also establish "new centers within games that help showcase China's power," or use games to build its financial and commercial power, he said. "The next Chinese games might only allow users to purchase items in digital Yuan," said Prakash. "Or, the Chinese games might have Chinese platforms, like TikTok, embedded into them."

Others doubt that Chinese owners of Western gaming studios will try to change the games that get sold in the West.
"I would be very skeptical of something like that happening," Louise Shorthouse, a senior games analyst at Ampere Analysis, told CNBC.
Steven Bailey, principal analyst at Omida, told CNBC that "Chinese companies have had involvement in various Western game companies and content for quite some time, and understand that successfully making games for the West will not be supported by such changes."
He added: "Conversely, anyone releasing a game in China will need to adapt it for that market."
Tencent's sprawling investmentsTencent and NetEase have been snapping up stakes in gaming firms beyond China's borders for years with little opposition.
"Tencent keeps buying the #1 game in every niche in North America and Europe," wrote tech investor Rodolfo Rosini on Twitter in February. "This is important because games have cultural influence. And controlling the present and how reality is portrayed is very powerful."
"If Tencent were to buy a stake in every leading newspaper and TV company people would be up in arms, there would be political hearings etc," he added. "Instead they play the long game and they are buying the next generation's media properties without any competition."
For years, Hollywood has spread American values around the world and championed the country's military might. Now it could be China's turn to try to do the same, but through video games. However, while Hollywood often criticizes the U.S. and the actions of Washington D.C., China's tech giants would not be able to say a bad word against Beijing, which exercises great control over all of its domestic enterprises.
China has more gamers than any other country, making it a highly lucrative market for those that can get in. One of the reasons that U.S. and European gaming firms take investment from Chinese companies is that they're legally obliged to partner with a Chinese company before their game can be released in the country.
U.K.-headquartered Sumo became the latest gaming firm to sell to a Chinese tech behemoth on Monday, announcing a $1.26 billion deal with Tencent, which is the world's largest video game publisher.
Neither company immediately responded when CNBC asked how, or indeed if, Tencent will influence the games that Sumo works on.
But Tencent has traditionally taken a hands off approach to its investments and acquisitions, according to Daniel Ahmad, senior analyst at Niko Partners.
"The company could also be an invaluable partner for Tencent as it looks to push into the AAA game space itself with its own projects," said Ahmad.
"The deal would also help Sumo utilize Tencent's expertise in regard to games development and publishing within China," he added.  
"Chinese game studios are looking to grow overseas and while organic growth is one option, acquisition allows these companies to build a presence much faster and with local talent," said Ahmad.
Tencent also invested $150 million in Reddit in 2019, angering some Reddit users in the process who were concerned that the platform may experience more censorship. However, this does not appear to have happened in any significant way.

Rising Seas Are Coming For Big Tech Campuses. Who Will Pay To Protect Them?

When residents of Sunnyvale tuned into City Council meetings this spring, they heard discussions about a welcome topic in the Bay Area: additional housing.

Like in the rest of Silicon Valley, home values in the largely suburban city have skyrocketed due to a severe housing shortage. In May, the median home sale price in Sunnyvale was $1.8 million.

To help alleviate the shortage, Sunnyvale is setting its sights on a 1,300-acre triangle of land known as Moffett Park, sitting on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay. Today, it’s mostly offices, the low-rise buildings separated by wide parking lots.

Sunnyvale hopes to transform the Moffett Park neighborhood.
Marissa Leshnov for NPR

Sunnyvale is reimagining it as an “eco-innovation district,” potentially allowing up to 20,000 units of housing for the first time, including affordable housing, as well as 10.5 million square feet of office and commercial space. New developments would feature green space with biking trails and landscaping for native wildlife. The city is doing an environmental analysis of the plan over the next year.

“One of the most sustainable things you can do is put people where they work and put people where transit is, so this is a huge opportunity,” says Michelle King, principal planner with the city of Sunnyvale.

The vision isn’t just Sunnyvale’s. It’s shared by one of the largest landowners in Moffett Park: Google.

Over the past five years, Google has quietly acquired 75 parcels there, worth almost $3 billion, according to tax records. In 2017, the company wrote a letter to Sunnyvale officials, urging them to rezone Moffett Park to allow housing and higher-density development.

Now, Google has several large construction projects underway, including its Caribbean project, two buildings with sloping green roofs, separated by a landscaped flood control channel. The company says as it expands, it plans to build mixed-use development, as it’s doing around the Bay Area, which combines offices, green space and housing available for the public, including affordable housing.

“We’re incorporating sustainability into everything we do in our developments,” says Jeff Holzman, Google’s director of real estate district development for Sunnyvale. “And we’re doing it to support our employees but also the community and hopefully the environment.”

Some are asking: Why build here at all?
The future of Moffett Park also includes sea level rise, which is expected to inundate a large part of it. Just like nearby cities, Sunnyvale is protected by aging levees that don’t currently meet federal safety standards.

Without those levees, parts of Moffett Park would already be underwater because the land has sunk. Before the arrival of tech companies, Sunnyvale was farmland, home to vast rows of fruit trees. Farmers pumped groundwater for irrigation, causing the land level to drop.

Silicon Valley was once called “the Valley of Heart’s Delight,” home to orchards and farms.
San Jose Public Library, California Room, Historic Postcard Collection

That groundwater, sitting a few feet below the surface in some spots, is another potential source of flooding. As sea levels rise, saltwater doesn’t just flood onshore. It also encroaches underground, pushing up groundwater that’s already there, closer to the surface.

When it rains, shallower groundwater gives runoff nowhere to go.

“It’s like a sponge that’s already soaked and full of water,” says Kristina Hill, associate professor of environmental planning and urban design at the University of California, Berkeley. “So you can’t get any more water into it.”

As a result, rainstorms can cause flash flooding, even forcing water out of sewer drains onto surrounding land. Shallower groundwater can also spread chemicals or contaminants in the soil. Traditional shoreline protection, such as levees, can’t stop it since the water is moving underneath.

“If you spent billions of dollars to build levees and then behind the levee, the groundwater comes up anyway and people are flooded out any time that it rains, that’s going to be seen as a failure,” Hill says.

Faced with this information, some city residents are asking why construction would be permitted in low-lying areas.

“Moffett Park is already heavily developed and is an employment center for the city,” King, the city planner, responded in a November meeting. “The city has a great interest in making sure that Moffett Park is protected in the future and that the investment that’s been put into Moffett Park at this point remains where it is.”

Funding runs short to build a new levee
To protect Moffett Park, Sunnyvale is pinning its hopes on a new levee, like other Bay Area communities. But efforts have already hit hurdles.

The county’s water utility, Valley Water, is leading the South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Protection Project. It would protect 18 miles of shoreline, potentially costing almost $2 billion.

The first section of levee, now nearing construction in a neighboring city after 15 years of planning, has already raised flags about funding.

Congress granted $124 million in 2018 to build the project, but construction bids came back almost double what was expected. Valley Water is covering the shortfall, raising its share of the project’s cost to $269 million, vastly more than it had planned for.

Now, as the agency looks at building two more sections of levee, including Sunnyvale’s, it’s warning that it can’t do it alone. Localities will need to contribute.

“They need to share the responsibility with us,” says Richard Santos, a member of Valley Water’s board of directors. “Because we’re all in collaboration together, and they all receive the benefits. But they all don’t pay. You know, you wanna play, you gotta pay.”

JJ Harris/Techboogie/KQED

Which comes first: a levee or new buildings?
Sunnyvale is facing a timing problem, too: The levee could take several decades to build, leaving new homes and buildings unprotected against rising seas.

That’s giving some City Council members pause.

“Can I get comfortable with housing in the context of sea level rise?” says council member Russ Melton. “That’s where people live.”

Melton sees the need for more housing. But since there isn’t housing in Moffett Park now, the decision to allow it comes with considerable risk. Before voting, he needs assurances that the levee will be built.

“I’m going to need to see something that is plausible, that is funded, that has the political ability to get across the finish line before we make an irrevocable decision to allow housing in Moffett Park,” he says.

A feasible levee plan is years away. In the meantime, the city is weighing if it should have Google wait on its new construction, where thousands of people will live and work.

Google says allowing its projects to move forward would help ensure everyone is protected.

“I think that all of Sunnyvale needs to contribute to the solution, and I think we’re absolutely going to do our fair share and our part,” says Google’s Holzman.

Google is planning a major expansion beyond its Google Cloud campus in Sunnyvale.Marissa Leshnov for NPR

The company says it’s willing to contribute financially to build a levee if other Moffett Park businesses are asked to do the same.

“We kind of need projects like Moffett Park and others to move forward, so that it creates the economic ability to contribute into these solutions,” Holzman says. “The problem is going to exist whether we do more things in Moffett Park or not. And so it gives us a chance to help contribute to what needs to be a community solution.”

Experts say that economic argument can be problematic, because it incentivizes moving more people into harm’s way. Developing in risky areas can help pay for protections there, but what if those protections fail?

“Obviously, the challenge there is you have just put a lot of people at the forefront,” says Linda Shi, professor of city and regional planning at Cornell University. “If a storm surge supersedes what the sea wall there is built for, then those residents are the ones that are actually the first ones to be hit by that much water.”

Google, along with other Moffett Park property owners, is now considering building its own levee to provide flood protection sooner than a larger project would.

Cities have little incentive to say no
Around the country, city councils like Sunnyvale’s are on the front lines of decisions that are becoming increasingly risky in a hotter climate. With control over zoning and land use, they determine who is in the path of future disasters.

Still, cities face an inherent conflict. New development is crucial for their financial health. Responding to a flood disaster, on the other hand, is often paid for by the federal government.

“It’s always the incentive of local governments to build things that bring in sales tax or property tax revenue,” Lubell says, “because that is the main financial mechanism where local governments get their funding.”

That can make it diff

中國與塔利班舉行會談,推動政治解決阿富汗僵局

中方熱情歡迎塔利班高層,會談提升了該組織的國際地位。中國敦促該組織進行和談,還要求塔利班公開承諾,不允許武裝分子利用阿富汗領土作為基地,在中國境內發動襲擊。
Li Ran/Xinhua, via Associated Press
週三,中國天津,塔利班副領導人毛拉·阿卜杜勒·加尼·巴拉達爾(左)與中國外交部長王毅。

德国小球迷遭网暴 英国人发起募捐 结局暖心 | DW | 10.07.2021

(德国之声中文网)这笔钱原本是要给她的,这位泪洒伦敦温布利球场的德国小女孩。在欧洲杯16强的比赛中,英格兰2比0淘汰了德国、晋级8强。这让德国球迷们心碎,其中也包括这位来到球场观战、身着德国队服的小女孩。她哭着扑到爸爸怀里的照片传遍世界。
然而在社交媒体上,一些英格兰球迷对这位德国小女孩进行了恶意嘲讽和攻击,甚至提到了二战,称其为"小纳粹"。这种网暴行为也让很多英国人感到愤慨。其中就包括前英格兰国脚加里·莱因克尔(Gary Lineker)和斯坦·科利莫尔(Stan Collymore)。

为了让小女孩心中好受一些,来自威尔士的乔尔·休斯(Joel Hughes)发起了众筹活动。他表示,这是为了向德国小女孩表明,并非所有英国人都"那么可怕"。
这位51岁商人最初设定的众筹目标是500英镑。而截至7月7日中午,已经有超过3200人捐款,数额超过了3.6万英镑(约折合4.2万欧元)。
"彼此温柔相待 世界会更美好" 小女孩的家人向捐款者致谢,同时表示将众筹款转捐给联合国儿童基金会(Unicef),这一家人希望保持匿名。他们在众筹平台Just Giving上的一份声明中说:"我们的女儿希望将慷慨的捐款转交给联合国儿童基金会,让善款、善心得到善用。"
在16强比赛中被英格兰淘汰让很多德国球迷心碎
该众筹平台表示,小女孩一家这一慷慨的姿态证明了他们相信,当人们彼此之间友好相待时,世界会变得更美好。"在几千位捐助者的支持下,全世界成千上万的儿童将从联合国儿童基金会的工作中受益。"
(德新社,明镜在线)
© 2021年 德国之声版权声明:本文所有内容受到著作权法保护,如无德国之声特别授权,不得擅自使用。任何不当行为都将导致追偿,并受到刑事追究。

美国两大股指将剔除更多中国公司

(德国之声中文网)标普道琼斯决定从8月2日起从其指数中剔除25家中国公司,而富时罗素则表示将在7月28日从其指数中再剔除20家中资企业。富时罗素表示,该决定是基于指数用户和利益相关方的反馈。
美国总统拜登6月3日签署行政命令,禁止向与中国军方有关的公司进行投资。路透社的相关报道中称,上述两家股指公司的决定可能会给在美国上市的中国公司带来更多的麻烦,目前他们正疲于应对中国政府对科技行业的管控和为加强数据安全工作而进行的全面监管审查。
在过去十年中,美国资本市场一直是中国公司向往的资金来源,尤其是对于科技公司,他们希望其估值赶上美国本土的上市同行,并利用庞大的流动性资金池。然而,中国在过去一周通过网络安全审查打击了几家希望在美国上市的公司。
网约车巨头滴滴出行成为一个明显的打击目标。就在几天前,该公司刚在纽交所上市筹资44亿美元。在中国下令将滴滴出行应用软件从移动应用商店下架后,滴滴的股价连续第四天下跌,周四再度收跌5.9%。
本周滴滴股价一路下跌
将从富时罗素和标普道琼斯的相关指数中删除的股票包括航空航天相关企业,如航天彩虹、中航高科和中航重机。富时罗素的删除名单还包括中国重工、内蒙一机。标普道琼斯指数则包括中航电测和北方导航等。这些个股将从富时全球股票指数系列、富时中国A股指数系列以及相关指数中删除。
由于美国的制裁,富时罗素此前已将包括中芯国际和海康威视等中国公司从其指数中剔除。
对于美国两大股票指数决定剔除更多中国公司,中国外交部发言人汪文斌表示,个别企业不被纳入上述指数“并不妨碍国际投资者通过多种方式投资于这些企业,分享中国发展的红利。”而删除优秀的中国企业,“只会降低这些指数的权威性和代表性,这是他们自己的损失”。这位发言人还表示,“美方的有关行径,严重违背美方一贯标榜的市场竞争等通行国际经贸规则,违背时代发展潮流,会损及各国投资者利益,也会损害美国利益和自身的形象。”
(路透社)
© 2021年德国之声版权声明:本文所有内容受到著作权法保护,如无德国之声特别授权,不得擅自使用。任何不当行为都将导致追偿,并受到刑事追究。

后默克尔时代 德国对华政策将转弯? | DW | 25.06.2021

(德国之声中文网)德国总理默克尔即将在今年九月的德国大选后卸任。最新民调预测,目前由默克尔的联盟党(CDU/CSU)与社民党(SPD)组成的大联合政府时代即将终结,政党将开始重新洗牌,绿党或自民党有望参与执政。这两党都曾批评默克尔在对华政策上将经济考量置于优先地位。若未来自民党或绿党加入组成下届政府,德国未来的对华政策是否会有所转变,成为值得关注的话题。
联盟党本周发布的竞选纲领中宣布其对华政策称,在德国对外关系方面,“最大的外交和安全政策挑战如今来自中国。中国是竞争者、合作伙伴,但也是制度性对手” 。绿党总理候选人贝尔博克(Annalena Baerbock)今年四月就表示希望德国对中国的全球野心采取更强硬立场。
VIDEO
德国智库墨卡托中国研究中心(MERICS)高级分析师Ariane Reimers周四(6月24日)发表分析文章指出,在此次德国大选中,中国扮演了更重要的角色,各党在竞选政策中几乎都囊括了中国政策,切入的角度包括地缘战略挑战、市场准入条件和人权状况,而每个政党关注的角度都有所不同。

墨卡托中国研究中心制作了德国六大政党对华政策的分析表格, 从表上可以看出,除了左翼党(Linke)和选项党(AFD),其他政党都认为应进一步发展欧中策略,提升欧洲在数位化和技术等领域竞争力,并一致要求公平经济关系。社民党和绿党有意与中国在气候议题上合作;社民党、绿党和自民党皆谴责了新疆及香港的人权及自由状况;绿党和自民党则表达对台湾的支持。此外,联盟党和绿党在竞选纲领中都明确提到应利用跨大西洋合作与中国抗衡。
作者Ariane Reimers总结分析,联盟党主要强调中国对外交及安全政策构成的挑战;绿党则关注人权状况及气候议题;社民党谴责了新疆和香港局势,但表达对话意愿;自民党竞选纲领中涉及中国的部分主要聚焦于人权议题、法治安全以及扩大对台关系。左翼党在对华批评上较为保留,希望保持对等立场。选项党一方面支持德国参与“一带一路”的倡议,同时又批评中国通过孔子学院干涉海外事务,被认为是自相矛盾。
文章还指出,联盟党没有在竞选纲领中提到人权状况,而社民党、绿党和自民党则达成了共识。绿党及自民党在政见中更深入探讨了相关议题,包括中国存在的强迫劳动状况、香港局势、对公民的监控等。
联盟党总理候选人拉舍特、绿党候选人贝尔博克和社民党总理候选人舒尔茨
值得一提的是,有望成为默克尔接班人的拉舍特本周二在德国联邦工业协会(BDI)组织的会议上曾表示:“我支持政府的中国策略…(在人权议题方面)我们必须向北京表达关切,但没有必要彻底改变我们的对华政策。”拉舍特称,与中国开启新冷战不是正确的做法。
墨卡托分析师Ariane Reimers认为,从各政党的竞选纲领看来,可以预期大选后对华政策会出现转变。“目前德国的中国政策是双边导向,尤其是在经济利益方面。未来更强的欧洲导向将会与现有的策略形成对比。在5G辩论中亦然,各党至少都含蓄表达了支持欧洲解决方案,并对依赖外国数字技术的做法提出警告。若自民党和绿党加入未来的联邦政府,可能会对中国采取更强硬的态度。”
但该文作者也强调,竞选纲领只是意向声明,未来德国的中国政策走向还要等到组阁谈判时才会变得明朗。
(Merics,路透社)
© 2021年 德国之声版权声明:本文所有内容受到著作权法保护,如无德国之声特别授权,不得擅自使用。任何不当行为都将导致追偿,并受到刑事追究。